Continue: Open source AI code assistant for VS Code and JetBrains.
Continue is an open source coding assistant that plugs into existing editors rather than asking developers to switch environments. Its main draw is control: teams can choose models, connect local or hosted providers, and customize how context is gathered. Continue is a good fit for engineering groups that want AI assistance but are wary of closed editor platforms. It usually requires more setup than a polished commercial editor, especially if a team wants private model routing or internal conventions, but that setup is also the point for many buyers.
Quick facts
- Pricing
- Open source with bring-your-own model costs and enterprise options.
- Free tier
- Yes
- Supported languages
- JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust, Most editor-supported languages
- Platform
- VS Code, JetBrains
- Open source
- Yes
- Models used
- OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Ollama, Local models, Custom providers
Continue review
Continue is an open source coding assistant that plugs into existing editors rather than asking developers to switch environments. Its main draw is control: teams can choose models, connect local or hosted providers, and customize how context is gathered. Continue is a good fit for engineering groups that want AI assistance but are wary of closed editor platforms. It usually requires more setup than a polished commercial editor, especially if a team wants private model routing or internal conventions, but that setup is also the point for many buyers.
In practice, Continue is most useful when the team picks a narrow workflow and measures whether the tool improves that job. For teams needing model control, developers staying in vs code or jetbrains, open source ai workflows, the important question is not whether the demo looks impressive. It is whether the generated code fits your repository, whether the tool makes its changes easy to inspect, and whether a developer can recover quickly when the model misunderstands the task.
Pricing also matters because AI coding usage can grow faster than expected. Open source with bring-your-own model costs and enterprise options. Check the vendor pricing page before buying because usage limits and model access can change. Teams should test realistic prompts, not only a single autocomplete, and estimate monthly cost for heavy users, occasional reviewers, and nontechnical collaborators separately.
The strongest reason to choose Continue is fit. It supports VS Code, JetBrains and is commonly used with JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java. That makes it a credible option for teams needing model control, developers staying in vs code or jetbrains, open source ai workflows. The weaker fit is users wanting a turnkey hosted product, nontechnical app builders, teams unwilling to configure models, where a different category of AI coding tool may be more effective.
Best for
- - Teams needing model control
- - Developers staying in VS Code or JetBrains
- - Open source AI workflows
Not great for
- - Users wanting a turnkey hosted product
- - Nontechnical app builders
- - Teams unwilling to configure models
Pros
- - Open source
- - Model-provider flexibility
- - Works in existing editors
- - Good fit for private deployments
Cons
- - More setup than Cursor
- - Quality depends on chosen model
- - Enterprise polish varies by configuration
- - Less magical out of the box
Pricing breakdown
Open source with bring-your-own model costs and enterprise options. Confirm current limits and usage terms on the official pricing page before adopting it across a team.
Compare Continue
| Dimension | Continue | Zed |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Open source with bring-your-own model costs and enterprise options. | Free editor with optional paid AI and collaboration services. |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| Open source | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms | VS Code, JetBrains | macOS, Linux, Windows preview |
| Languages | JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Java, Rust | Rust, JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, Go, Many LSP-backed languages |
| Models | OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Ollama, Local models, Custom providers | Claude, OpenAI-compatible models, Bring-your-own API options |
| Best for | Teams needing model control, Developers staying in VS Code or JetBrains, Open source AI workflows | Developers who value editor performance, Open source-minded teams, Pair programming |
Related tools
A fast collaborative editor with AI features and an open source core.
Zed is a high-performance code editor from the team behind Atom and Tree-sitter. It is not only an AI coding tool, but its AI features make it relevant for developers who care abou...
Review ZedAn AI-first code editor for agentic edits across real projects.
Cursor is the best-known AI-native editor for developers who want chat, autocomplete, repo-aware edits, and increasingly agentic workflows inside a VS Code-like environment. Its st...
Review CursorAn AI coding environment from Codeium focused on multi-file flow.
Windsurf is Codeium's AI coding editor for developers who want an integrated editor experience with autocomplete, chat, and agent-like changes. It is often compared directly with C...
Review WindsurfGoogle agent-first IDE for managing autonomous coding workstreams.
Google Antigravity is an agent-first development environment that pushes beyond autocomplete and chat into agent orchestration. The product combines a familiar editor surface with ...
Review Google AntigravityOpen source AI pair programming from the terminal.
Aider is an open source command-line coding assistant that edits files in a local Git repository and works with multiple model providers. It has a loyal following because it is sim...
Review Aider